Is there a discussion in these works of the different forms or degrees of autonomy considered desirable or realistic?
To answer the question of whether there is any reflection on the forms or degrees of autonomy deemed desirable or realistic, we do indeed find several relevant elements of analysis in these works.
Several sources highlight that financial autonomy is a desirable and even necessary goal for the sustainability and independence of NGOs and DOs. The book “Strengthening Financial Autonomy” is entirely dedicated to this issue and explores an “alternative financing model for moving toward financial autonomy.” This model is based on the creation of reserves and equity, as well as the generation of income from the organization’s activities.
However, the authors are also realistic about the level of autonomy achievable and recognize the current dependence of many organizations on international aid. Fernand Vincent points out in the “Manual of Fundraising and Financial Management” that 95% of NGOs in the South depend on aid and would disappear if it stopped. Therefore, the approach advocated is often one of gradually strengthening financial autonomy while building a partnership with aid agencies.
Different forms or degrees of autonomy are implicitly addressed:
Relative financial autonomy: This involves gradually reducing dependence on external aid by diversifying funding sources and developing own revenues. The manuals offer tools and strategies to achieve this goal, such as creating revolving funds, developing economic activities, and mobilizing local savings.
Institutional and political autonomy: Financial autonomy is presented as a key element of institutional and political autonomy, allowing grassroots organizations in the developing world to strengthen their power of expression and decision-making. This implies not only being financially independent, but also being able to define their own priorities and strategies without being dictated by donor agendas.
The Question of Total Independence: The “Funding and Financial Management Manual” raises the question of whether it is really possible to be completely independent and to what extent this independence should go in the face of necessary interdependence. This question suggests a recognition that interdependence and partnerships can be important, even in the pursuit of autonomy.
The book “Strengthening Financial Autonomy” highlights that international aid must evolve to support the autonomy of development associations, by planning with them for the “end of aid” and helping them create their own revenues and reserves. This implies a shift in the way aid is delivered, moving from financing “projects” to supporting the institutional development of partners.
In summary, the works recognize the importance and desirability of financial, institutional, and political autonomy for NGOs and DOs. They adopt a realistic perspective by recognizing current dependence and propose strategies for a gradual strengthening of this autonomy, while highlighting the complexity and nuances of the notion of total independence in a context of interdependence.
